<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Storm&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/</link>
	<description>Blessays, blogs and blisquisitions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen R</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>So... where the heck are we supposed to find the giant condoms that fit over our iMacs?

(Though they have been making &quot;keyboard condoms&quot; for years now.  Is that enough protection, Mr. Fry?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; where the heck are we supposed to find the giant condoms that fit over our iMacs?</p>
<p>(Though they have been making &#8220;keyboard condoms&#8221; for years now.  Is that enough protection, Mr. Fry?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolly Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolly Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dolly Williams...&lt;/strong&gt;

Good work....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dolly Williams&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Good work&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antivirus free downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Antivirus free downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AVG download...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AVG download&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulesLt</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>JulesLt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>A little delayed, as for some reason I&#039;d not correctly set up the RSS feed for the blog.

Firstly, I&#039;d like to say hats off to Mr.Fry for avoiding any mention of the Mac in his article, because it would have been both a distraction from the piece, and perhaps also detracted from the message (&#039;ooh, look, it&#039;s one of those Mac users banging on about how secure the Mac is again&#039;).

Also because there have been Mac and Linux systems that have been found in botnets.  How, you may ask?

Well, while your basic operating system may be secure, there are a number of programs you can install that can make that irrelevant - for instance, if you&#039;re running a web server or database exposed to the Internet, you have a piece of software that&#039;s (a) sitting their listening to requests from the Internet (b) capable of running programs (not native Windows or OS X programs, but programs nonetheless. Some d/b and web servers can, for instance, send email).

Now luckily, this is software that domestic users are currently unlikely to run. It&#039;s also unfair to blame the operating system in this case, but it does show that using OS X or Linux does not proof you against such things entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little delayed, as for some reason I&#8217;d not correctly set up the RSS feed for the blog.</p>
<p>Firstly, I&#8217;d like to say hats off to Mr.Fry for avoiding any mention of the Mac in his article, because it would have been both a distraction from the piece, and perhaps also detracted from the message (&#8216;ooh, look, it&#8217;s one of those Mac users banging on about how secure the Mac is again&#8217;).</p>
<p>Also because there have been Mac and Linux systems that have been found in botnets.  How, you may ask?</p>
<p>Well, while your basic operating system may be secure, there are a number of programs you can install that can make that irrelevant &#8211; for instance, if you&#8217;re running a web server or database exposed to the Internet, you have a piece of software that&#8217;s (a) sitting their listening to requests from the Internet (b) capable of running programs (not native Windows or OS X programs, but programs nonetheless. Some d/b and web servers can, for instance, send email).</p>
<p>Now luckily, this is software that domestic users are currently unlikely to run. It&#8217;s also unfair to blame the operating system in this case, but it does show that using OS X or Linux does not proof you against such things entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyeraim</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-2122</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyeraim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-2122</guid>
		<description>It may be a very strange thing that I&#039;ve gotten only a few keylogger or spyware kind of things. I bought a router ADSL-modem for my internet connection five years ago, and never have I been sorry for paying a so much more for it back then. A hardware firewall is truly the best defence against hijacking. Perhaps I might give an example: using a condom is the greatest defence against STD:s and unwanted pregnancy. Using only a foam or magic is a great way to get STD:s and children.

A router with hardware firewall should be your condom, a software firewall is always up you. You will get what you want.  And the children in this case are the zombie spam servers; but it&#039;s not as bad as it seems, as long as you&#039;re protected atleast with a software firewall; it does the job more than well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be a very strange thing that I&#8217;ve gotten only a few keylogger or spyware kind of things. I bought a router ADSL-modem for my internet connection five years ago, and never have I been sorry for paying a so much more for it back then. A hardware firewall is truly the best defence against hijacking. Perhaps I might give an example: using a condom is the greatest defence against STD:s and unwanted pregnancy. Using only a foam or magic is a great way to get STD:s and children.</p>
<p>A router with hardware firewall should be your condom, a software firewall is always up you. You will get what you want.  And the children in this case are the zombie spam servers; but it&#8217;s not as bad as it seems, as long as you&#8217;re protected atleast with a software firewall; it does the job more than well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minty</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>Minty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Fry, this is my first ever entry so I wish to get a few things out of the way first. Just the usual stuff. I&#039;ve been a fan too long to remember how long and I will always be very fond of Jeeves and Wooster and Lord Melchet (sp?). Then again who isn&#039;t? This is a wonderful website you have yourself here especially your own personal contributions via this blog. Love it, don&#039;t stop I could read you forever. Also as someone who loves words I want to thank you for giving us &#039;Blessay&#039;. I find that such an endearing and memorable word.
My partner is also a gadget freak, more so computers these days. I was wondering what your views on Vista may be? We haven&#039;t actually used it yet though my other half as usual is dissing it before he&#039;s even tried it saying its worse than XP. Take care 

Safe travels

Hugs xxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Fry, this is my first ever entry so I wish to get a few things out of the way first. Just the usual stuff. I&#8217;ve been a fan too long to remember how long and I will always be very fond of Jeeves and Wooster and Lord Melchet (sp?). Then again who isn&#8217;t? This is a wonderful website you have yourself here especially your own personal contributions via this blog. Love it, don&#8217;t stop I could read you forever. Also as someone who loves words I want to thank you for giving us &#8216;Blessay&#8217;. I find that such an endearing and memorable word.<br />
My partner is also a gadget freak, more so computers these days. I was wondering what your views on Vista may be? We haven&#8217;t actually used it yet though my other half as usual is dissing it before he&#8217;s even tried it saying its worse than XP. Take care </p>
<p>Safe travels</p>
<p>Hugs xxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snow</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hello...&lt;/strong&gt;

wonderful post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hello&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>wonderful post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Steed</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>John Steed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>Essentially one feels as though the average computer user (such as myself) is more or less the equivalent of a toddler left home alone with a bottle of bleach, a box of matches, exposed power points and a boiling pot on the stove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essentially one feels as though the average computer user (such as myself) is more or less the equivalent of a toddler left home alone with a bottle of bleach, a box of matches, exposed power points and a boiling pot on the stove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slinkoff</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>slinkoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>in my opinion the threat of viruses is vastly overrated, i don&#039;t even bother with AV anymore, it&#039;s a real killer on performance, even the smaller footprint software like AVG or nod32.  It only takes a bit of common sense to recognise spam and to not open any strange attachments.

I haven&#039;t had a virus since sometime in the 90s and nobody i know has either so running something that scans every file each time I access it is a relatively pointless use of my system&#039;s resources.

Even if I was infected, it really isn&#039;t that bad   I could install AV software and clean it, restore my system from a backup (system restore/ghost image) or worst case, reinstall the OS, doesn&#039;t take as long as you think and a good opportunity for a spring clean. 

The problems that people do experience are really that of spyware embedded in some dodgy shareware downloaded from somewhere less than reliable or by allowing a website to install something.  The solution?  Don&#039;t install anything but the minimum you need (flash, quicktime alternative, real alternative etc.) and then refuse everything else.  Do a spyware can every month or so if you&#039;re really paranoid and if you have other members of your household who are think that Smiley Central is cool then give them a Limited computer account and explore system policies to lock them down even more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my opinion the threat of viruses is vastly overrated, i don&#8217;t even bother with AV anymore, it&#8217;s a real killer on performance, even the smaller footprint software like AVG or nod32.  It only takes a bit of common sense to recognise spam and to not open any strange attachments.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had a virus since sometime in the 90s and nobody i know has either so running something that scans every file each time I access it is a relatively pointless use of my system&#8217;s resources.</p>
<p>Even if I was infected, it really isn&#8217;t that bad   I could install AV software and clean it, restore my system from a backup (system restore/ghost image) or worst case, reinstall the OS, doesn&#8217;t take as long as you think and a good opportunity for a spring clean. </p>
<p>The problems that people do experience are really that of spyware embedded in some dodgy shareware downloaded from somewhere less than reliable or by allowing a website to install something.  The solution?  Don&#8217;t install anything but the minimum you need (flash, quicktime alternative, real alternative etc.) and then refuse everything else.  Do a spyware can every month or so if you&#8217;re really paranoid and if you have other members of your household who are think that Smiley Central is cool then give them a Limited computer account and explore system policies to lock them down even more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Corderoy</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/2007/11/17/storm/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Corderoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenfry.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>For those unfortunates using Microsoft Windows XP, have a look at AVG&#039;s free anti-virus offerings.  They&#039;re widely recognised to be high quality and unobtrusive compared with competitors that are forever asking you to upgrade to a non-free version.  http://free.grisoft.com/  Note, I&#039;ve no connection with AVG, I&#039;m just trying to provide some advice to those that may not know how to protect themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those unfortunates using Microsoft Windows XP, have a look at AVG&#8217;s free anti-virus offerings.  They&#8217;re widely recognised to be high quality and unobtrusive compared with competitors that are forever asking you to upgrade to a non-free version.  <a href="http://free.grisoft.com/" rel="nofollow">http://free.grisoft.com/</a>  Note, I&#8217;ve no connection with AVG, I&#8217;m just trying to provide some advice to those that may not know how to protect themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.140 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-11 05:38:50 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
