<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>The New Adventures of Mr Stephen Fry &#187; Topic: Siri&#039;s Return Reputation Under Suspicion of being Fawlty</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/forum/topic/siris-return-reputation-under-suspicion-of-being-fawlty</link>
		<description>Just another bbPress community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.stephenfry.com/forum/rss/topic/siris-return-reputation-under-suspicion-of-being-fawlty" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Nitro on "Siri&#039;s Return Reputation Under Suspicion of being Fawlty"</title>
			<link>http://www.stephenfry.com/forum/topic/siris-return-reputation-under-suspicion-of-being-fawlty#post-279621</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Nitro</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">279621@http://www.stephenfry.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/why-the-problem-with-siri-matters/853&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/why-the-problem-with-siri-matters/853&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Was someone on the Siri, ( the &#38;quot;assistant app&#38;quot; in the Apple store that is fairly popular ), development team a religious, pro-life fanatic who snuck some not-so-liberal design principles into the applications &#38;quot;nature&#38;quot;? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The suspicion is not so crazy-paranoid, especially if you&#38;#39;ve ever written a software program in your life ( read: php, perl, VB, jax, html....erm, yeah...these don&#38;#39;t &#38;#39;count&#38;#39; in terms of real software engineering, sorry but there&#38;#39;s big kids and adults and the two don&#38;#39;t jibe &#38;#39;under the hood&#38;#39; ). Point is, a software engineer, particularly a savvy, experienced one, could very easily design a program with a whollllllll lotta &#38;#39;default&#38;#39; behaviors that would strike most people as behaviors that should not be &#38;#39;default&#38;#39;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Like, plotting against someone you don&#38;#39;t know and never will, behind their back, simply because you don&#38;#39;t like what they write should not be a default behavior and isn&#38;#39;t, as far as I know,  considered either socially acceptable nor particularly intelligent.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We know that pro-lifers have done some really crazy stuff. For example, starting The Army of God. A few members, I believe, were guilty of murdering doctors who worked in clinics that offered women abortions should they so choose.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The article to the link above indicates Siri has some problems with women finding rape counseling centers and abortion clinics. Hmmm....on first glance most would think,&#38;quot;Meh, just some trivial glitch.&#38;quot; I wouldn&#38;#39;t even be surprised if some of Siri&#38;#39;s female users first blamed themselves for Siri returning &#38;#39;pro-life counseling&#38;#39; centers.  But Siri has been put to the query test over and over lately and isn&#38;#39;t really coming out smelling so particularly &#38;#39;enlightened&#38;#39; when it comes to womens issue....sorry, but the question,&#38;quot;Who and how many were responsible for designing Siri?&#38;quot; is certainly credible and the answer to that question is important. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think many of you can imagine lots of ramifications of malfunctioning software as those that are &#38;#39;life critical&#38;#39;. That&#38;#39;s a no-brainer.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But what about search engines who are designed not just to get you results, but to get results *in your best interests* as determined by people you don&#38;#39;t know? What do you think of that?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
