psst - the answer is yes
John Sessions
| Topic RSS | Reply to topic | ||||
| Author | Post | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Posted Sun Dec 16th, 2007 9:51am Post subject: John Sessions
Isn't he wonderful?
psst - the answer is yes |
||||
| Back to top | ||||
|
Pseudo_lawyer |
Posted Sun Dec 16th, 2007 2:09pm Post subject: John Sessions
Yes!
I heart John Sessions! First saw him on Whose Line many, many years ago, and have adored him ever since. |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
|
amyl_nitrate |
Posted Sun Dec 16th, 2007 4:27pm Post subject: John Sessions
I first saw him on Gormenghast.
Assuming direct control... |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
|
ClareBear |
Posted Sun Dec 16th, 2007 4:59pm Post subject: John Sessions
Ahhh....Sessions.
I'd like to see him back, tbh. |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
|
amyl_nitrate |
Posted Sun Dec 16th, 2007 5:01pm Post subject: John Sessions
Me too. I've been watching series A again and I want to see Danny Baker and Howard Goodall and Meera Syal and Peter Serafinociz all back on again.
Assuming direct control... |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
|
Mandibles |
Posted Mon Dec 17th, 2007 12:05am Post subject: John Sessions
I too am a Sessions fan.
Shame he wasn't in QI Series E, but he has been rather ill this year I'm told. Poor John. *sendshimlotsofloveandcuddles* Natalie: "Are you finished with your coffee cup Stephen?" *5 minute debate later* Result: The contents of the cup do not determine the name of the cup. The cup is a cup/mug whether it contains tea/coffee/ribena/hot chocolate or any other beverage. |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
|
Posted Mon Dec 17th, 2007 11:07am Post subject: John Sessions
What sort of ill?
Ive loved him since the early days of WL - which for me was 94...he is in the holy trinity for me....sessions, fry and slattery... All hail... Now chant with me onomatopoeia onomatopoeia onomatopoeia |
||||
| Back to top | ||||
|
Mandibles |
Posted Mon Dec 17th, 2007 12:01pm Post subject: John Sessions
Don't worry I don't think he's SERIOUSLY ill.
Just the "Oh god I don't think I can go into work this week" ill. Natalie: "Are you finished with your coffee cup Stephen?" *5 minute debate later* Result: The contents of the cup do not determine the name of the cup. The cup is a cup/mug whether it contains tea/coffee/ribena/hot chocolate or any other beverage. |
|||
| Back to top | ||||
Reply
You must log in to post.



