Topic RSS | Reply to topic
Author Post

4orty2


Member

Posted Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 5:48pm Post subject: Politics rant
I was watching the VP debate last night (at 2 in the morning) and one thing, among a lot of other things, made me slightly angry (to say the least).

How can someone and that someone would be Sarah Palin stand there and proudly proclaim (twice, actually) that she stands for freedom, equality and tolerance (!) and at the same time be against abortion and gay marriage?!?!

I know, I know ... the majority of the American voters are conservative and bla bla bla BUT that statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever with regards to her religious beliefs. Why can't they just leave people alone and stop judging them based on their sexual partners or private decisions?

Back to top

joan


Member

Posted Sat Oct 4th, 2008 9:07am Post subject: Politics rant
It's a mystery - but the whole right-wing religious stuff makes no sense to me at all. AND, how come most 'pro-life' people are pro-death penalty? - Another mystery.

Here's an extract from what Matt Taibbi wrote about her in 'Rolling Stone':-

Sarah Palin is a symbol of everything that is wrong with the modern United States. As a representative of our political system, she’s a new low in reptilian villainy, the ultimate cynical masterwork of puppeteers like Karl Rove. But more than that, she is a horrifying symbol of how little we ask for in return for the total surrender of our political power. Not only is Sarah Palin a fraud, she’s the tawdriest, most half-assed fraud imaginable, 20 floors below the lowest common denominator, a character too dumb even for daytime TV – And this country is going to eat her up, cheering every step of the way. All because most Americans no longer have the energy to do anything but lie back and allow ourselves to be jacked off by the calculating thieves who run this grasping consumer paradise we call a nation.

I don't think he likes her very much either......

Back to top

acidcat


Member

Posted Sun Oct 5th, 2008 3:37pm Post subject: Politics rant
Sarah Palin is the ultimate hockey mom - Ice cold and needs hitting repeatedly with sticks

(Shamelessly stolen from Sandi Toksvig's News Quiz script 3 October 2008)

Back to top

megoon


Member

Posted Sun Oct 5th, 2008 3:46pm Post subject: Politics rant
it is mystery why she is blatently contradicting herself

1 people choose to have abortions because they're FREE
2 gay people choose to get married because thier in love and allowed to be so because they're FREE


awww you got me moody now

Back to top

IdeaCollector


Member

Posted Sun Oct 5th, 2008 5:37pm Post subject: Politics rant
Actually I think the whole debates can best be summed up by a friend of mine who up until then was still debating herself as to who to vote for.

"Joe Biden did a good job. Sarah Palin was very supporting of John McCain and clearly thinks we should vote for him. However, Sarah...I was kinda hoping to learn what you stood for and what you would do if McCain died".

God I hope my absentee ballot comes soon so I can send in my vote and feel smug until election day when McCain wins.

I used to be EternalStudent on these forums until the switch over. So don't get excited..I'm not someone new and exciting. I'm just me :P

Back to top

amyl_nitrate


Member

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 8:54am Post subject: Politics rant
She's horrible, horrible, horrible! She does not stand for freedom at all. It's a joke. I'll never understand right-wing attitudes. It seems so backwards thinking to me. Trying to restrict other people's lives because they've got some kind of stupid issue with them and want to ruin things for everyone else. How selfish. If they don't like it they should just turn the other way no one's forcing them to watch. Pro-life is anti-choice and anti-woman. When I say I'm pro-choice I'm talking about not only the right to have an abortion but the right to choose to keep the child. Pro-choice isn't about forcing women to have abortions it's about the right to choose what's right for you and no one else should have control over that. It makes me sick thinking there are horrible people who want to cut back on people's rights like LGBT rights. That's just wrong. We should all have the same human and civil rights. Your sexuality doesn't make you any less of a person or citizen than anyone else.

Assuming direct control...

Back to top

joan


Member

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 11:27am Post subject: Politics rant
She's horrible, horrible, horrible! She does not stand for freedom at all. It's a joke. I'll never understand right-wing attitudes. It seems so backwards thinking to me. Trying to restrict other people's lives because they've got some kind of stupid issue with them and want to ruin things for everyone else. How selfish. If they don't like it they should just turn the other way no one's forcing them to watch. Pro-life is anti-choice and anti-woman. When I say I'm pro-choice I'm talking about not only the right to have an abortion but the right to choose to keep the child. Pro-choice isn't about forcing women to have abortions it's about the right to choose what's right for you and no one else should have control over that. It makes me sick thinking there are horrible people who want to cut back on people's rights like LGBT rights. That's just wrong. We should all have the same human and civil rights. Your sexuality doesn't make you any less of a person or citizen than anyone else.

Well said - I absolutely agree. The woman is evil.

Back to top

ClareBear


Moderator

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 12:30pm Post subject: Politics rant
It's why i'm hoping the right thing happens, I'm hoping that voter turnout is miles higher than the last few times around.

Back to top

IdeaCollector


Member

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 5:02pm Post subject: Politics rant
Did anyone catch this quote during the VP debates?


"So do you support gay marriage?"

Biden: Barack and I don't support gay marriage, but we do believe that the relationship between a homosexual couple and a heterosexual couple are essentially the same thing.

"And you, Senator Palin?"

Palin: Uhh... WHAT HE SAID.

Fantastic.

I used to be EternalStudent on these forums until the switch over. So don't get excited..I'm not someone new and exciting. I'm just me :P

Back to top

IdeaCollector


Member

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 5:13pm Post subject: Politics rant
Or if you'd like a summation of the total debate...



I used to be EternalStudent on these forums until the switch over. So don't get excited..I'm not someone new and exciting. I'm just me :P

Back to top

TobiasMonk


Moderator

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 5:14pm Post subject: Politics rant
There's another debate tomorrow evening between Obama and McCain, and I hope Obama can kick it up a few notches because the prospect of McCain and Palin in our White House is too nauseating for me to think about for the next 4 weeks. As for voter registration and turnout, they're already predicting that it will be much higher because of Obama, and because Americans are fed up with this administration. I'm voting for Obama, but I wish he had picked Hillary to be his running mate.

My voter registration card is attached to the front of my monitor.

I cannot be awake for nothing looks to me as it did before, Or else I am awake for the first time, and all before has been a mean sleep.
Walt Whitman

Back to top

acidcat


Member

Posted Mon Oct 6th, 2008 8:55pm Post subject: Politics rant
OK, can I start by agreeing with the posts here and pointing out that I'd consider myself reasonably (centre-) left as far as politics is concerned... but I'd like to play devil's advocate for Sarah Palin.

Amyl, would you support the right of a child to live? I assume you wouldn't support the right of a parent to decide they didn't like their kid and let them drown them at six months old.

How about as a new born baby?

How about 8 months into pregnancy?

(You're smart enough to see where this is going, don't you?)

I'm pretty much pro-choice, but I've been thinking about this recently, and if it was me having to administer the abortion... let's just say I don't know where I stand on the "later" end of things. I mean, 24 weeks (6 months) into a 37-40 week (9 month) pregnancy term...

Have you seen what a 24 week foetus looks like?

http://www.visembryo.com/baby/index.html

I've been thinking about this recently, and I don't know the answer. I just think it might not be a clear-cut and dried issue.

(But I'm still very sure where I stand on early abortion, and unlike the delightful Ms. Palin, where I stand on the right to choose especially after rapes).

Back to top

joan


Member

Posted Tue Oct 7th, 2008 6:27am Post subject: Politics rant
I've thought about abortion a lot - I grew up when it was illegal and saw the results of two illegal home-administered ones.

The first - I was in hospital myself when this woman was wheeled in. ER was full so they pulled the curtains round her and patched her up. The Docs and nurses went in clean, and came out covered in blood. It was clear she nearly died. When I saw her, she was so pale her freckles stood out in 3D. Hospital policy was to NEVER report such abortions to the police, but to patch the woman up, and then treat her with distain. Other patients knew this (I was only 17) and rallied round her to cheer her up. She had 5 kids, hubby was on the dole, and she just couldn't face number 6. The moral support those older women gave her was phenomenal, and it was the first time I ever saw true feminism in action.

The second was our next door neighbour. She had 8 kids, and one day sent for my Mum urgently. She was having a 'miscarriage' she told Mum, but Mum knew she'd 'done something' because she was scared of Mum getting the Doctor. Mum sent for him anyway, and before he went in, she warned him not to dob 'or else'. He said "We never do, or women would be too afraid of us, and would die". She lost a lot of blood, but survived. The Doc recommended she have her tubes tied, which she did.

I agree there is something bad about late term abortions, and I would prefer they all be done in the first trimester when we can be certain that the foetus is non-sentient. But it is essential that women have choice, or many women would die, become infertile, suffer pain and fear, or have unwanted babies born into misery.

I lost a baby at 26 weeks - the placenta had failed and I simply went into labour and it was stillborn. I was heartbroken, and the nurses told me it was a perfectly formed and beautiful little boy. For this reason i hate the thought of late term abortions, but sometimes there could be mitigating circumstances. (I ended up with two healthy sons later)

Choice is the key. No-one is going to force anyone to have one, after all.

BUt Palin would have the US return to those dangerous times for women, that I remember with horror.

Back to top

Soupy Twist


Member

Posted Tue Oct 7th, 2008 8:42am Post subject: Politics rant
Germany, after decades of heated discussions, has worked out a kind of compromise: abortion for other than medical reasons is permitted, i.e. it isn't legal but goes unpunished, for the first trimester (12 weeks). Mandatory for the woman is state-regulated counselling and a three-day waiting period prior to an abortion. The counselling is supposed to act for the rights of the unborn child and give the mother all her options (financial aid etc.), yet the ultimate decision is absolutely hers. Abortions after the 12th week are illegal except for severe medical causes.
Though the legislator is a bit sitting on the fence here I appreciate the attempt to support both the unborn child's rights and the mother's choice. As joan rightly says, choice is the key.

Back to top

acidcat


Member

Posted Tue Oct 7th, 2008 10:55pm Post subject: Politics rant
Yipes, Joan, that sounds horrendous. I'm sorry to hear about your experiences with abortions, they both sound awful. I think the stories emphasise the need for extensive (and early) sex education - something that the republicans don't support... Net result: lots of unwanted babies.

I think you fully understand my point. My problem with the full pro-choice line is the question whether the baby has a right to life say at 24 weeks, over-ruling the right for the lady to choose? Soupy Twist's information about Germany's early limit suggests that they have managed to sidestep it by making the limit very early, before most people think the foetus even has a chance of sentience and certainly couldn't survive if born at that stage...

I'm so dubious about the late abortion. There was a case of Charlotte Wyatt in the UK who was born prematurely at 26 weeks (was in the news for a different ethical decision - the choice of doctors vs the choice of parents to withdraw treatment) who apparently is now alive and 4 years old... makes me wonder whether at the later stages of termination, we have little children in the uterus, and not just a bunch of cells...

Back to top